This years Le Mans 24 Hours produced a one-two-three finish for Audi, while Peugeot hasn’t drawn such a blank in the French race since 1991.
Peugeot’s first attempt at Le Mans (with the exception of its pre-war entries) ended in disappointment when its two 905s were sidelined after a few hours only.
This weekend, the French carmaker suffered its biggest setback in endurance racing in almost 20 years, with its three factory cars and the single customer car failing to reach the finish. Prior to this year’s event, only one Peugeot 908 HDI FAP had suffered the same fate (in 2007).
Peugeot Sport didn’t really deserve such a beating. Not only was the 908 faster in testing and for a big part of the race, but it was also the most consistent. One of its three cars spent 274 laps in the lead, and its build-up to the race included eleven 30-hour test sessions, plus participations in this year’s 12 Hours of Sebring and 1,000km de Spa.
The N°2 Peugeot led from 10:33pm until 7:02am, which amounts to 7 hours and 29 minutes (i.e. 30 per cent of the race). From the early hours of Sunday morning, Montagny, Minassian and Sarrazin had been lapping in 3m24s/3m25s, which is between three and four seconds slower than the car’s potential permitted.
For Audi, finishing first, second and third was a practically unhoped for result, and was obtained thanks only to the single weapon it had in its arsenal this year: the reliability of its car and drivers. The German team didn’t suffer the slightest mechanical problem, and its drivers steered clear of trouble on the track, with the exception of Kristensen’s tangle with his mate Andy Priaulx. Only one of the three Audi R15s had to be wheeled into its garage for work during the race!
Following the Ferrari/Ford decade between 1960 and 1970, and Porsche’s domination of 1980s, Audi has left an indelible mark on the first decade of the 21st Century with a score of nine wins (plus another under the Bentley name with a disguised Audi R8C) between 2000 and 2010.
24 Hours of Le Mans, Audi, Peugeot
14/06/2010 22:39
Peugeot cursed ?… Let’s examine that for a minute…
Led by the #2 Peugeot a few minutes after 7 am on Sunday, the #1 and #4 withdrew from the race with apparently similar engine issues. The engine failures that struck the #2 and #4 were in particular strikingly similar. I do not believe that this is pure coincidence. While you could argue that the #1 and #4 failed because the drivers pushed too hard to catch up with the Audi’s, the #2 was said to be “cruising” at the time the engine burst into flames. You may therefore reasonably wonder whether any of the 908’s could have reached the end of the race whatever the circumstances…
Peugeot were NOT cursed I believe, but rather struck by a series of engine failures (except for the #3) that could well be the result of Peugeot pushing the engine “tuning” too much to the extreme. It was mentioned on Eurosport during the broadcast of the race that the 908’s engine was developing the same amount of power (if not more…) than the year before despite the new engine restrictions imposed on diesel-powered cars. WTH ?!?!? If that is true, what were the people at Peugeot expecting ? Who knows what would have happened later on during the race with the #3 had the car not suffered the suspension problem…
The thing that baffles me from Peugeot is the considerable “wastage”… Why on earth were they trying to run 4 or 5 seconds quicker than the Audi’s with the evident reliability risks ? Were they overly confident or trying to “crush” Audi ? Probably.
In the end, this is a very bitter and painful experience for Peugeot…and very bad for their brand image…
Like the “Very Wise” Emanuele Pirro (or probably some other guy before him) said: “In order to finish first, first you have to finish”.